Resident perception of obstetrics and gynecology residency breast disease curriculum: a national study.

BACKGROUND: As part of the education objectives in obstetrics and gynecology residency programs, the Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology includes benign breast disease and breast cancer screening, diagnosis, and management. However, obstetrics and gynecology residency curricula vary highly in their focus on this subject. The comfort level of the average obstetrics and gynecology resident in the United States in managing breast disease is unknown. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the perspective of obstetrics and gynecology residents in the United States on their education and training in breast disease. STUDY DESIGN: An 18-question survey was distributed to all Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education program coordinators to distribute to their residents collect demographic information, training environment, and perspective on breast disease education. All statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (version 2.0; IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY). RESULTS: The survey was distributed to 241 programs, and a response was received from 28 programs (a program response rate of 12.0%). Based on the programs' response, there was a total of 582 eligible residents, and the survey was completed by 180 residents (a response rate of 31.0%). Of all responses, 121 residents (67.2%) did not have a dedicated breast disease rotation or clinical time. Most residents were uncomfortable with their education, training, and ability to manage benign breast disease (mean of 4.14 on a scale of 1-10). Most residents desired additional dedicated time to breast education during their obstetrics and gynecology training. The only variable associated with an improved resident comfort level for the management of breast disease was dedicated clinical time (relative risk [RR], 2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04-1.45; P=.04). CONCLUSION: Obstetrics and gynecology residency programs should consider adding dedicated clinical time to breast disease to increase their residents' comfort with breast disease management.

Letters of recommendation for gynecologic oncology fellowship differ by gender and race.

INTRODUCTION: Letters of recommendation (LOR) play a significant role in applicant selection for gynecologic oncology (GO) fellowship. LORs can be agentic, associated with competence, independence and strength, or communal, associated with being accommodating, cooperative and empathetic. Agentic LORs have been shown to reflect favorably on applicants, making them more likely to be selected for interview. The primary goal of this study was to determine linguistic differences in LORs for applicants applying to GO fellowship based on applicant gender and race. METHODS: All applications to a single academic institution from the years 2018-2020 were analyzed. LORs were extracted from all applicants who self-reported their gender and race/ethnicity. Analysis was performed using Linguistic Inquiry Word Count (LIWC) in terms of agentic and communal language. All analysis was done using SAS version 9.4. RESULTS: From 2018 to 2020, there were 239 GO fellowship applications to a single academic institution. There were 186 (78.1%) applicants who identified as female and 52 (21.8%) who identified as male. Female applicants were more likely to have more research (p = 0.047) and volunteer activities (p = 0.02) than male applicants. There were no differences between female and male applicants in terms of age, geographic location of residency, USMLE scores, AOA status, number of publications or attending a Doximitiy-rated top 20 residency program. There were 139 (60.7%) applicants who identified as White, 46 (20.1%) as Asian, 16 (7.0%) as Black, 19 (8.3%) as Latinx and 9 (3.9%) as other. On multivariable analysis, LORs written for male applicants had higher agentic scores compared to females (p < 0.05), and LORs of female applicants received higher communal scores (p < 0.05). LORs for applicants who identified as Black or Latinx were found to have lower agentic scores compared to individuals who identified as White(p < 0.05 for both). CONCLUSION: There were demonstrated linguistic differences in LOR for GO fellowship based on applicant gender and race/ethnicity. LORs written for white, male applicants were more likely to have higher agentic scores compared to minority, female applicants. LORs written for female applicants were more likely to have higher communal scores. As LORs have been shown to be instrumental in GO fellowship interview selection and linguistic differences exist based on applicant gender and race/ethnicity, this study highlights the need for a more objective GO fellowship application process. DISCLOSURES: Portion of this paper was presented at the Society for Gynecologic Oncology as part of a focus plenary.

Outcomes for patients with high-risk endometrial cancer undergoing sentinel lymph node assessment versus full lymphadenectomy.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) among patients with high-risk endometrial cancer (EC) who underwent sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping and dissection compared to patients who underwent pelvic +/- para-aortic lymphadenectomy (LND). METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed high-risk EC were identified. Inclusion criteria included patients who underwent primary surgical management from January 1, 2014 to September 1, 2020 at our institution. Patients were categorized into either the SLN or LND group based on their method of planned lymph node assessment. Patients in the SLN group had dye injected followed by successful bilateral lymph node mapping, retrieval, and processing per our institutional protocol. Clinicopathological and follow-up data were extracted from patient's medical records. The t-test or Mann-Whitney test was used to compare continuous variables and Chi-squared or Fisher's exact test were used for categorical variables. Progression-free survival (PFS) was calculated from the date of initial surgery to the date of progression, death, or last follow-up. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the date of surgical staging to the date of death or last follow-up. Three-year PFS and OS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test was used to compare cohorts. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to assess the relationship between nodal assessment cohort and OS/PFS while adjusting for age, adjuvant therapy, and surgical approach. A result was considered statistically significant at the p < 0.05 level of significance and all statistical analysis was done using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). RESULTS: Out of 674 patients diagnosed with EC during the study period, 189 were diagnosed with high-risk EC based on our criteria. Forty-six (23.7%) patients underwent SLN assessment and 143 (73.7%) underwent LND. No difference was observed between the two groups in regards to age, histology, stage, body mass index, tumors myometrial invasion, lymphovascular space invasion, or peritoneal washing positivity. Patients in the SLN group underwent robotic-assisted procedures more frequently than those in the LND group (p < 0.0001). The three-year PFS rate was 71.1% (95% CI 51.3-84.0%) in the SLN group and 71.3% (95% CI 62.0-78.6%) in the LND group (p = 0.91). The unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) for recurrence in the SLN versus LND group was 1.11 (95% CI 0.56-2.18; p = 0.77), and after adjusting for age, adjuvant therapy, and surgical approach, the HR for recurrence was 1.04 (95% CI 0.47-2.30, p = 0.91). The three-year OS rate was 81.1% (95% CI 51.1-93.7%) in the SLN group and 95.1% (95% CI 89.4-97.8%) in the LND group (p = 0.009). Although the unadjusted HR for death was 3.74 in the SLN vs LND group (95% CI 1.39-10.09; p = 0.009), when adjusted for age, adjuvant therapy, and surgical approach, it was no longer significant with a HR of 2.90 (95% CI 0.94-8.95, p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in three-year PFS in patients diagnosed with high-risk EC who underwent SLN evaluation compared to those who underwent full LND in our cohort. The SLN group did experience shorter unadjusted OS; however, when adjusting for age, adjuvant therapy and surgical approach, there was no difference OS in patients who underwent SLN compared to LND.

Missing a chance to prevent: disparities in completion of genetic evaluation in high-risk patients with endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The primary goal of this study is to examine disparities in high-risk endometrial cancer (EC) patients in relation to rates of genetic referrals (GR), testing (GT), and counseling (GC). METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of patients with newly diagnosed EC between January 1, 2014 and September 1, 2020 at a single institution. Patients were defined as high-risk EC patients when they were 1) diagnosed at 50 years or younger, 2) had a positive family history for cancer or 3) had evidence of loss of mismatch repair protein expression on tumor immunohistochemistry. Rates of GR, GT and GC were analyzed based on race, ethnicity, primary language and insurance status. RESULTS: During the study period, 674 patients were diagnosed with EC and 249 (36.9%) were considered high-risk EC patients. Among high-risk patients, 128 (51.2%) were referred to GT and GC. Of those referred, 103 (80.5%) underwent GT and 85 (66.4%) completed GC. Out of all high-risk patients, 20 (18.4%) were positive for LS on GT and 29 (28.2%) had VUS results. In multivariate analysis, the odds of GT and GC referral were lower among patients who identified as Hispanic (OR=0.40; 95% CI=0.19-0.87; p=0.020). Patients who identified as black were less likely to receive GC when compared to patients of other races (p=0.030). CONCLUSION: It is our hope that through this data we will increase awareness around existing disparities in genetic evaluation for patients with EC and ultimately create strategies to improve equitable access to care for all patients.

The use of Instagram by gynecologic oncology providers as a patient education tool for patients at high-risk of gynecologic cancer.

Social media outlets have increased in popularity within the last decade and are influencing the ways in which patients interact with the healthcare system. The objective of this study is to examine the presence of gynecologic oncology divisions on Instagram and to analyze the content of their posts. Secondary objectives included examining and analyzing the use of Instagram as a tool for patient education among people at increased genetic risk of gynecologic cancers. Seventy-one NCI-Designated Cancer Centers, their gynecologic oncology divisions and hereditary gynecologic cancer related posts were searched on Instagram. Content was reviewed and authorship was analyzed. Of the 71 NCI-designated Cancer Centers, 29 (40.8 %) had Instagram accounts, whereas, four (6 %) gynecologic oncology divisions had Instagram accounts. The search of the seven most common gynecologic oncology genetic terms yielded 126,750 posts with the majority under BRCA1(n = 56,900) and BRCA2 (n = 45,000) followed by Lynch syndrome (n = 14,700) and hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (n = 8,900). In terms of authorship, 93 (66 %) of all top 140 posts were written by patients, 20 (14.2 %) were written by health care providers and 27 (19.3 %) were written by "other." This study highlights the lack of presence of divisions of gynecologic oncology at NCI-designated Cancer Centers on Instagram but does demonstrate the existence of active discussion on hereditary gynecologic cancers on Instagram by patients.

Systematic Review of Pelvic Anatomy iOS and Android Applications for Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

IMPORTANCE: Resources for learning and enhancing knowledge in medicine, such as mobile applications (apps), have dramatically increased in recent years; however, there is lack of a valid source for identifying the best and most reliable mobile apps. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to identify the highest scoring available pelvic anatomy apps based on quality, content, and functionality for obstetrician-gynecologists using a validated tool. STUDY DESIGN: This was a systematic evaluation of anatomy apps in the Apple iTunes (iOS) and Google Play (Android) stores. Exclusions included apps that had nonhuman, nonanatomy content, did not include female pelvic anatomy or were deemed inappropriate for postgraduate level. The validated Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS), a mobile-health (mHealth) app scoring system was used to evaluate apps based on both objective and subjective quality. The authors' MARS scores for each variable were compiled, and the objective, subjective, and overall scores were calculated. RESULTS: The search criteria yielded 2,432 apps: 952 (39%) Apple iTunes store and 1,480 (60.8%) Google Play Store apps. After applying the exclusion criteria, 35 (14 iOS, 8 Android, and 13 iOS/Android) apps were included for evaluation using the MARS system. "Complete Anatomy" app, available for both iOS and Android systems, obtained the highest objective, subjective, and overall MARS score. CONCLUSIONS: Although there are numerous anatomy apps available, only a few meet prespecified criteria for functionality, content, quality, and are appropriate for obstetrician-gynecologists. Using a validated scoring system, we present a scored list of female pelvic anatomy apps most appropriate for obstetrician-gynecologists.

Regional trends of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer and exploration of perioperative outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Radical hysterectomy (RH) with bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection is the standard treatment for early stage cervical cancer which can be performed either by an abdominal or a minimally invasive (MIS) approach. In 2018, Ramirez et al. presented their randomized-controlled trial data which demonstrated that patients who were treated with minimally invasive surgical (MIS) radical hysterectomy (RH) had higher rates of locoregional disease recurrence and lower rates of overall survival when compared to patients treated with an abdominal approach. The objective of this study is to examine the trends in management of patients diagnosed with cervical cancer in New York State (NYS) and to analyze their perioperative outcomes. METHODS: Using the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) Database, patients undergoing RH for early stage cervical cancer in NYS between the years of 2007-2015 were identified and categorized based on surgical approach. Demographic information was collected and multivariable regression was conducted to assess the impact of hysterectomy approach on perioperative outcomes. RESULTS: In NYS, 5575 patients were treated with RH for early stage cervical cancer with 3257 (58.4%) treated by abdominal RH and 2318 (41.6%) treated with MIS RH. Between the years of 2007 and 2015, patients diagnosed with cervical cancer treated with MIS RH increased from 25.7% to 48.3% respectively. Surgeons performing MIS RH were more likely to be younger (average age 47.1 vs 49.2, p < 0.001) and have less time elapsed from their fellowship graduation (20.37 vs 22.64 years, p < 0.001). Patients who saw high volume doctors (OR 1.95, CI 1.65-2.31) and were seen in high volume facilities (OR 1.40, CI 1.18-1.65) were more likely to undergo MIS RH compared to abdominal RH. Patients who underwent MIS RH were more likely to be discharged home as opposed to acute rehab or nursing facility, when compared to patients treated with abdominal RH (98.5 vs 94.2% p < 0.001). When analyzing perioperativce outcomes, patient undergoing MIS RH had a 85% decrease in length of hospital stay compared to abdominal RH, a 40% reduction in 30-day readmission rates, and a 10% reduction in hospital costs respectively. DISCUSSION: In our study period, between the years of 2007 and 2015, the number of cervical cancer cases treated with MIS RH increased from 25.7% to 48.3%. MIS techniques led to a reduction in length of hospital stay, patient readmission rates, and hospital costs. Based on recent data from Ramirez et al., preliminary data demonstrated decrease in MIS RH for treatment of cervical cancer after presentation of the LACC trial and our data confirmed these reported trends in NYS. With this change in surgical practice, there will be associated changes in perioperative outcomes. Moreover, for patients diagnosed with cervical cancer with microscopic disease or previous treatment with an excisions procedure, MIS approach should be considered for improvement in perioperative outcomes as long as oncologic outcomes are not compromised.

Cesarean Section Scar Ectopic Pregnancy in the Second Trimester: An Underrecognized Complication of Cesarean Deliveries.

The aim of this paper is to present a case of a cesarean section ectopic pregnancy (CSP) diagnosed in the second trimester and perform a literature review of current guidelines for the management of CSP in the second trimester. This was exempt from the Mount Sinai IRB. This is a case is of a 35-year-old P1122 at 13w4d who presented to our hospital with vaginal spotting and abdominal pain. The patient was found to have a cesarean section ectopic pregnancy with placenta increta. There are no management guidelines for second trimester CSP, and the published material is minimal. A literature review was completed and demonstrated two cases and one case series published on management of existing literature on management of second trimester CSP. Our patient underwent an uncomplicated total laparoscopic hysterectomy with bilateral salpingectomy, bilateral ureterolysis, and cystoscopy. She had an uncomplicated postoperative course and was discharged on postoperative day three with an unremarkable recovery at her two-week postoperative visit.